Discussion about this post

User's avatar
No One Important's avatar

A piece of land outside city limits, perhaps, with $5000 Sheds from Costco and a $50 cot, will provide shelter. Add a community bathroom and you've put a big dent in the "homeless problem". But, to politicians, the "homeless problem" becomes a money-laundering operation that makes them wealthy. Get $1M from an NGO, spend $100k to buy tents and pizzas for the homeless, and pocket $900K just like that.

Cynical? Perhaps. But, what city has ever SOLVED their "homeless problem". Why not? Maybe the mentally ill WANT to take drugs and live on the streets. Reagan defunded all the mental hospitals-- maybe its time to bring them back.

Expand full comment
Jack Sotallaro's avatar

I believe the Supreme Court determined that internment camps are constitutional in Korematsu, however in later cases the precedent of Korematsu was overturned by the Roberts Supreme Court.

It used to be that the help people needed came from civic organization and churches, not the government. As soon as government got involved it became a never ending story with expansion, not solving the problem, being the government goal.

I don't know that we can go back to private sector solutions, but internment camps by themselves are not.

Some positive effects cab be realized if churches and civic organizations get back in the game.

For those who cannot be helped by private sector initiatives, the alternative is to have government involved in a very structured way for those the civic option does not help.

How about we round those not responding or being helped by the civic option and charge them with some misdemeanor and sentence them to a year in a camp. If you can't get people on the right track in a year you can release them and when they go back on the streets, arrest, charge, and sentence to another year.

Lacking some proven method to modify free choice I don't have anything else..

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts