“Ethnic cleansing”

Can we talk?

Recently I almost responded sarcastically to some guy accusing me of desiring “ethnic cleansing” by supporting Israel’s proposed response to Hamas with, “You say that like it’s a bad thing.” I refrained, deciding my response needed a background, a preface.

But - ya know what…?

“Ethnic cleansing” is what BLM is about. It’s what college professors teaching that ‘whites are evil and need to be removed from the planet’ is about. It’s what the entire academic and corporate and government DIE anti-white campaign is about. It’s what BDS is about.

Ethnic cleansing - of whites - is what our ruling elites are demanding.

It takes some kinda chutzpah for the ruling elite to force on a population “ethnic cleansing” while decrying it as the worst thing ever…

Just as we need to get over the absurdities that “nationalism” equals Hitler and “State’s Rights” equals slavery, we need to get over the idea that separating tribes (“ethnic cleansing”) is a bad thing. It’s how people are separated that can be problematic, not that they are separated.

It’s what Palestinians are demanding there. It’s what the fighting in Kashmir is about. And it’s the only way Jews are ever going to stop being attacked: separate from Muslims from their neighborhood…

It’s when you don’t separate tribes that you get a bad result. Ask the Hutu and Tutsi. Ask the Sioux and the Crow. Or the young women dancing Saturday in Israel. And the “tribes” can be remarkably similar … Sunni & Shia have been killing each other for over a millennium.

Separating tribes creates peace. Forcing them together, under the guise of “Diversity,” “Affirmative Action,” “DEI,” “multiculturalism,” or a “Two-State Solution” creates war. Look around.

What do people think the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia was about as it created the nation-state, other than separating warring factions/tribes?

Why have the Middle East & south Asia been falling apart for decades? Why was Afghanistan such a mess? Iraq? Etc.? Because the Westerners inventing those fake countries ignored tribes.

It’s why Yugoslavia fell apart. Czechoslovakia separated nonviolently - but that split was every bit as much about “ethnic cleansing.” Maybe we call it “ethnic washing” when it’s nonviolent - but it’s still about separation.

There’s a case to be made that, had we entered Afghanistan and forcibly split it into three countries based on the tribal territories, we’d’ve been done there a million lives and trillions of dollars sooner. And the “forcibly” perhaps could have been minimal. But we stuck with a non-tribal fake country.

How’d that work out?

When the USSR fell apart it was smart enough to let the tribes go their own way. How many of them now are fighting each other? One: Chechnya: to get the infidels out… ethnic cleansing separation.

In America we had a good thing going because what we today call “trad Americans” came here and joined our American tribe.

This was what “assimilation” was. By assimilating, they also were “cleansing” themselves of ethnic hatreds and behaviors foreign to our tribe, seeing the benefit of being in our tribe as outweighing the benefit of the tribe they voluntarily left behind to purposefully join Tribe America.

At base, it’s tribalism; people are tribal. We have a need to belong to a tribe. We gave them a new, American tribe, free of all Europe’s incessant intertribal warfare if they joined our tribe. We  encouraged them to do so before the establishment made “assimilation” a four-letter word. And we were pretty much peaceful.

But the elites found it too hard to conquer us as a whole so have been dividing us to conquer us for several decades now.

Pick a dividing line; they all are about dividing us into tribes:

• Red v Blue

• Mask v Not

• Vax v Autonomy

• Abortion v Autonomy

• Guns v Not

• Speech v Censorship

• Mom-at-home v Feminism

• Climate hoax v Facts

• Government school v Homeschool

We let enemies and their useful idiots convince us that our American tribe, free to be joined or left, was bad and that we needed multi-tribes to come in and we needed to destroy our own tribe.

We needed to ignore that our tribe had created the freest, most prosperous and modern tribe on the planet - and that we’d let anyone join who wanted to. Joiners just had to put our tribe first and leave the hatreds of their tribe behind. If they wanted to wear the clothes, eat the food, speak the language of their old tribe - go for it. But in the American Public Square they needed to be Americans - to support and believe in our new, let’s call it “cosmopolitan” tribe.

Separation can be, should be, peaceful. Brexit involved no combat. If Catalonia or Quebec or Scotland were turned loose, there’d be no wars.

Heck, if we’d let Ukraine alone, there’d be no war. But our anti-assimilation elites just had to assimilate Ukraine into NATO, knowing a very powerful nearby tribe wanted the Ukrainian tribe left alone.

How’s that working out?

We may be at the point here of needing to separate the Red and Blue tribes. Books, both serious and unserious are being written about it, academic conferences held, water cooler discussions.

Peaceful or non-peaceful will be a choice. So far, history shows no forced tribal integration working out, no matter how advantageous… we can go with mostly peaceful murderous riots by Antifa & BLM, with election theft, or peaceably call it a day.

People are tribal. Separating them, but allowing voluntary movement between tribes results in peaceful societies. Forcing tribes together… creates war.

Which is your preference for the future? An 80-year-old trope based on a historically-unique totalitarian mass murderer with a goofy mustache…or common sense?